1) CDC. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections, 2011. http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/pdf/guidelines/bsi-guidelines-2011.pdf
2) Pearson, ML. Guideline for prevention of intravascular device-related infections. Part I. Intravascular device-related infections : an overview. The Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control. 24 (4), 1996, 262-77.
3) CDC. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections, 2002. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5110a1.htm
4) Van Donk, P. et al. Routine replacement versus clinical monitoring of peripheral intravenous catheters in a regional hospital in the home program : a randomized controlled trial. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 30 (9), 2009, 915-7.
6) Webster, J. et al. Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 17 (3), 2010, CD007798.
7) Lai, KK. Safety of prolonging peripheral cannula and i.v. tubing use from 72 hours to 96 hours. Am J Infect Control. 26 (1),1998, 66-70.
8) Garland, JS. et al. Peripheral intravenous catheter complications in critically ill children : a prospective study. Pediatrics. 89, 1992, 1145-50.
9) Garland, JS. et al. Infectious complications during peripheral intravenous therapy with Teflon catheters : a prospective study. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 6 (10), 1987, 918-21.
10) Eyer S, et al. Catheter-related sepsis : prospective, randomized study of three methods of long-term catheter maintenance. Crit Care Med. 18 (10), 1990, 1073-9.
11) Uldall, PR. et al. Changing subclavian haemodialysis cannulas to reduce infection. Lancet. 1 (8234), 1981, 1373.
13) Snydman, DR. et al. Intravenous tubing containing burettes can be safely changed at 72 hour intervals. Infect Control. 8 (3), 1987, 113-6.
14) Maki, DG. et al. Prospective study of replacing administration sets for intravenous therapy at 48-vs 72hour intervals. 72 hours is safe and cost-effective. JAMA. 1987, 258 (13), 1777-81.
15) Josephson, A. et al. The relationship between intravenous fluid contamination and the frequency of tubing replacement. Infect Control. 6 (9), 1985, 367-70.
18) Maki, DG. et al. Prospective randomised trial of povidone-iodine, alcohol, and chlorhexidine for prevention of infection associated with central venous and arterial catheters. Lancet. 338 (8763), 1991, 339-43.
19) Chaiyakunapruk, N. et al. Chlorhexidine compared with povidone-iodine solution for vascular catheter-site care : a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2002, 136 (11), 792-801.
20) Maki, DG. et al. Evaluation of dressing regimens for prevention of infection with peripheral intravenous catheters. Gauze, a transparent polyurethane dressing, and an iodophortransparent dressing. JAMA. 258 (17), 1987, 2396-403.
21) Menyhay, SZ. et al. Preventing central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections : development of an antiseptic barrier cap for needleless connectors. Am J Infect Control. 36 (10) : (Suppl 174), 2008, e1-5.
22) Sherertz, RJ. et al. Education of physiciansin-training can decrease the risk for vascular catheter infection. Ann Intern Med. 132 (8), 2000, 641-8.