10 : Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 509 U. S. 579 (1993), at 593 (https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/509/579/)
11 : Frye v. United States, 54 App. D. C. 46, 47, 293 F. 1d 13, 1014 (1923).
12 : Faced with a proffer of expert scientific testimony under Rule 702, the trial judge, pursuant to Rule 104 (a), must make a preliminary assessment of whether the testimony's underlying reasoning or methodology is scientifically valid and properly can be applied to the facts at issue. Many considerations will bear on the inquiry, including whether the theory or technique in question can be (and has been) tested, whether it has been subjected to peer review and publication, its known or potential error rate and the existence and maintenance of standards controlling its operation, and whether it has attracted widespread acceptance within a relevant scientific community. The inquiry is a flexible one, and its focus must be solely on principles and methodology, not on the conclusions that they generate.
13 : State v. Shwartz, 447 N. W, 2d 442 (Minn. 1989) at 427
15 : 東京高裁判決 平成26年3月18日 判例タイムズ 1401号 373頁, 376頁
16 : 最高裁第三小法廷判決 平成7年6月20日 刑集 49巻 6号 741頁, 744-745頁